Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Artificial Intelligence news

Africa’s AI researchers are...

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI....

Generative AI taught a...

Teaching robots to navigate new environments is tough. You can train them...

A bold AI movement...

Kessel Okinga-Koumu paced around a crowded hallway. It was her first time...

How ChatGPT search paves...

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI....
HomeTechnologyElon Musk loses bid to...

Elon Musk loses bid to end SEC ‘muzzle’ over Tesla tweets


A federal appeals court on Monday rejected Elon Musk’s bid to modify or end his 2018 securities fraud settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission that required a Tesla lawyer to approve some of his tweets in advance.

The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Musk’s claim that the SEC exploited his consent decree to conduct bad-faith, harassing investigations that violated his First Amendment free speech rights under the Constitution.

Musk’s decree resolved an SEC lawsuit accusing him of defrauding investors with an Aug. 7, 2018, tweet that he had “funding secured” to take his electric car company private.

It required advance review of tweets that might contain material information about Tesla. Musk and Tesla each also paid $20 million in civil fines, and Musk gave up his role as chairman.

In the appeal, Musk’s lawyers called the pre-approval mandate a “government-imposed muzzle” that amounted to an illegal prior restraint on his speech.

But the three-judge appeals court panel said the SEC had opened just two subsequent inquiries into Musk’s tweets, and those tweets “plausibly violated” the decree’s terms.

The panel said the SEC’s “limited, appropriate inquiries in this case have not made compliance with the consent decree ‘substantially more onerous’” for Musk, as he had argued.


Elon Musk’s lawyers called the pre-approval mandate a “government-imposed muzzle” that amounted to an illegal prior restraint on his speech.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images

It also said Musk chose to allow screening of his tweets, and had no right to revisit the matter “because he has now changed his mind.”

Alex Spiro, a lawyer for Musk, said in an email: “We will seek further review and continue to bring attention to the important issue of the government constraint on speech.”

The SEC declined to comment.

Monday’s decision upheld an April 2022 ruling by US District Judge Lewis Liman in Manhattan.


Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters
Musk’s decree resolved an SEC lawsuit accusing him of defrauding investors with an Aug. 7, 2018, tweet that he had “funding secured” to take his electric car company private.
AP

Liman called Musk’s arguments a “bemoaning” of requirements he no longer wanted to adhere to now that Tesla had “become, in his estimation, all but invincible.”

Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion in October, and runs rocket and spacecraft manufacturer SpaceX. He is the world’s second-richest person, according to Forbes magazine.

In February, a San Francisco jury found Musk not liable for investor losses over his “funding secured” tweet.



Article Source link and Credit

Continue reading

Hackers are targeting people who type these six words into their computer

It’s catnip for hackers. Computer users Googling whether Bengal cats are legal to own after finding themselves victims of a bizarre cyber attack. Cybersecurity company SOPHOS issued an urgent warning on its website, urging people not to type...

Mark Zuckerberg not liable in lawsuits over social media harm to children

A federal judge said Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg is not personally liable in 25 lawsuits accusing his company of addicting children to social media. US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, Calif., rejected accusations on Thursday that Zuckerberg directed Meta’s efforts...

First art piece painted by humanoid robot sells at auction for a whopping $1 million

Sold! The first art piece painted by humanoid robot — which was expected to fetch up to $180,000 — shocked the crowd when it sold for a whopping $1.08 million. Sotheby’s, the famed auction house, sold the painting...